Profit Motive Underlies Outbreak of Immigration Bills

From Truthout:

Wednesday 7 September 2011

By: Brendan Fischer, Center for Media and Democracy | News Analysis

July 29 marked the one-year anniversary of Arizona’s controversial immigration law, a year that has seen similar anti-immigrant bills emerge across the country. Thanks to the release of over 800 pieces of “model legislation” by the Center for Media and Democracy, we can now pinpoint the source of the outbreak to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a bill factory for legislation that benefits the bottom line of its corporate members. While it has been reported that more immigrants behind bars means more income for ALEC member Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), less discussed has been how immigrant detention benefits commercial bail-bond agencies, an industry represented in ALEC through the American Bail Coalition.

Immigrant Detention and For-Profit Criminal Justice

The ALEC “No Sanctuary Cities for Illegal Immigrants Act” requires that state law enforcement officers enforce complex federal immigration law, gives private citizens the right to sue police or sheriff’s departments if they do not think the law is being enforced (regardless of whether law enforcement had been prioritizing more important issues like investigating violent crimes), makes presence on state soil without federal immigration status a criminal offense, and requires that employers use the flawed e-Verify system for hiring employees. This ALEC bill legalizes racial profiling and became Arizona’s SB1070.

Countless immigrant families that have been torn apart by the law. “Children don’t know what to do without their parents,” 10-year-old Catherine Figueroa told a Congressional panel in 2010; Figeuroa’s mother and father were arrested by Arizona state law enforcement on immigration charges.

To be clear, the bill’s sponsor Arizona Republican Rep. Pearce had long supported tough state-level immigration enforcement, but failed to get a bill into law in ’05, ’06, ’07, ’08, and ’09. Pearce only found success in 2010, after his idea for an immigration bill had been approved and endorsed by ALEC corporations. Xenophobia alone had not been sufficient to codify anti-immigrant sentiment into law — it required the support of the for-profit criminal justice industry. (more…)

Bishops Criticize Alabama’s Tough Immigration Law

From The New York Times:

The Rev. Mitchell Williams and more than 150 other ministers signed a letter denouncing Alabama’s new immigration law. (Josh Anderson for The New York Times)

By

Published: August 13, 2011

CULLMAN, Ala. — On a sofa in the hallway of his office here, Mitchell Williams, the pastor of First United Methodist Church, announced that he was going to break the law. He is not the only church leader making such a declaration these days.

Since June, when Gov. Robert Bentley, a Republican, signed an immigration enforcement law called the toughest in the country by critics and supporters alike, the opposition has been vocal and unceasing.

Thousands of protesters have marched. Anxious farmers and contractors have personally confronted their lawmakers. The American Civil Liberties Union and other civil rights groups have sued, and have been backed by a list of groups including teachers’ unions and 16 foreign countries. Several county sheriffs, who will have to enforce parts of the new law, have filed affidavits supporting the legal challenges.

On Aug. 1, the Justice Department joined the fray, contending, as in a similar suit in Arizona, that the state law pre-empts federal authority to administer and enforce immigration laws.

And on that same day, three bishops sued.

An Episcopal bishop, a Methodist bishop and a Roman Catholic archbishop, all based in Alabama, sued on the basis that the new statute violated their right to free exercise of religion, arguing that it would “make it a crime to follow God’s command to be Good Samaritans.”

“The law,” said Archbishop Thomas J. Rodi of Mobile, “attacks our core understanding of what it means to be a church.” (more…)

Ala. School Officials Speak Out Against H.B. 56

From Fox News:

By –July 26, 2011

PHENIX CITY, Ala. — Some Alabama educators fear the state’s new law cracking down on illegal immigration could jeopardize millions of dollars in federal funding for public schools.

At issue is one provision in the law requiring schools to report the number of undocumented students they enroll. Larry DiChiara, the superintendent of Phenix City Public Schools, said the requirement is impractical, if not unconstitutional.

“If a kid comes in here and speaks broken English, should we then begin some kind of document search on them?” DiChiara said. “Should we ask for their green card? Should we fingerprint them? We’re certainly not gonna do these things.”

Critics say schools should be in the business of education, not law enforcement. But lawmakers behind the new legislation say it’s all about statistics. (more…)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.