From The Arizona Republic:

Data indicate ‘birth tourism’ is not a widespread practice
By Daniel González – Aug. 17, 2011 12:00 AM
Hundreds of expectant women from Mexico come to Arizona every year specifically to deliver babies at hospitals near the border.
Some are in the country illegally. But many others are women of means who enter the country legally as tourists and pay cash to deliver babies at hospitals in Nogales, Yuma and Tucson.
In addition to medical care that is perceived to be better in the U.S., the mothers receive an added benefit: Their babies automatically become U.S. citizens.
The practice, dubbed “birth tourism” by critics, has been occurring along the border for years. It also happens in cities around the country where expectant women from overseas arrive by plane with tourist visas, with the goal of giving birth during their stay.
Some Republican lawmakers want to put an end to the practice of granting automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S., a right laid out in the 14th Amendment. They call such acts – whether children are born to illegal residents or legal visitors – an exploitation of the Constitution.
While birth tourism is real, there is little proof the practice is widespread, even in border states such as Arizona, where last year less than 2 percent of babies were born to non-resident mothers. (more…)
Filed under: Arizona, immigrant community | Tagged: 14th Amendment, anchor babies, Center for American Progress, Center for Immigration Studies, David Schweikert, Mexico, National Center for Health Statistics, Nogales, Pew Hispanic Center, Steve King, The Arizona Republic, Trent Franks, Tuscon, Yuma | Leave a Comment »


