New Immigration Laws Could Drive Up Food Prices

From The Tennessean:

Pedro Matus cuts tobacco stalks in a shed on George Marks’ farm in Montgomery County. Mateus is part of a crew of 19 documented workers from Santiago, Mexico, whom Marks hired to do seasonal work. / Dipti Vaidya / The Tennessean

By Chas Sisk

Nov. 27, 2011

HICKORY POINT, TENN. — Inside a spartan shed thick with the smell of moist tobacco, temporary laborers from the Mexican state of Nayarit deftly stripped a truckload of the plant’s broad leaves from its hardened stalks.

A foreman, Pedro Peña, handed racks of dark air-cured tobacco down to another worker, Lupe Villegas, who loaded each one onto one of two sets of chain drives. As the racks went along the drive, teams of eight workers laid the stalks bare and sorted the tobacco into three grades, all in less than a minute. A final worker removed the exposed stems and loaded them into a V-shaped crib.

Without these 19 men, most of whom have been coming back every fall for a decade, George Marks could not bring in the three varieties of tobacco he farms, he says. The same is true of dairy cows, which he also raises on his Montgomery County farm, and a host of other crops grown in Tennessee — peaches, tomatoes, gourds, apples.

“If, theoretically, you did get rid of all the Mexicans, you’d be hungry in a week,” Marks said. “All your vegetables had a Mexican hand on it. All your fruit, and three-quarters of your meat.” (more…)

Employers Still Mandated To Ask For Citizenship Status

From The Associated Press:

BY SEANNA ADCOX

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

COLUMBIA — The head of South Carolina’s labor agency said Monday that federal lawsuits challenging the state’s anti-illegal immigration law won’t affect the law’s mandate that businesses check their new employees’ legal status.

Director Catherine Templeton said lawsuits filed by the U.S. Justice Department and American Civil Liberties Union have no bearing on the part of the law her agency oversees. The two groups are asking a judge to prevent the law from taking effect Jan. 1, and to ultimately throw it out as unconstitutional. A hearing is set for Dec. 19.

But Templeton said neither lawsuit targets the requirements that all businesses run their new hires through the federal online system E-Verify, so her agency will begin enforcing those requirements regardless of what happens with provisions specifically challenged.

She contends that part is “in lock-step” with a U.S. Supreme Court decision earlier this year upholding an Arizona law putting rules on businesses. Using that May decision, South Carolina legislators tweaked a similar law they passed in 2008 as part of the larger anti- illegal immigration package they passed in June. (more…)

Sheriff Mark Curran: Why I Oppose “Secure Communities”

From Frontline:

October 18, 2011, 7:51 pm ET

Mark Curran, the Republican sheriff of Lake County, Ill., was initially onboard with the Obama administrations immigration program known as Secure Communities: “When you have local, state and federal law enforcement all sharing information, all working together, … that’s when we work best.” After seeing it in action, however, he’s become an outspoken critic. This is the edited transcript of an interview conducted on July 29, 2011.

Why did you decide to take a public position, basically saying you don’t think Secure Communities is a smart decision? …

… My faith comes from Christianity. I’m a Catholic. That’s basically the center upon which I make all decisions. …

I looked at what’s transpired in terms of individual stories. I’ve talked to people that have been here 20 years, have four or five children that are here, came here initially under the guise that they could provide for their family.

As you know, the borders were not enforced, and it was not a secret. You could talk to anybody that was in Mexico at that time, or Latin American countries, that wanted to come into the United States. They would tell you that they knew that they could come here, that they could work, that they could provide for their families. In many instances they did.

There was no, “Excuse me.” There was no attempt to determine citizenship status. That all changed.

When they were done providing for their families, they’d go back at the end of the summer season, in many instances, and come back and forth throughout.

Who are the people you see in your community who are undocumented but who make up part of this community, and who you worry could get swept up under a program like Secure Communities?

I’m worried about the people that have been here for long periods of time, … these people that our country lured into America in many instances, telling them that they could find jobs, jobs that we couldn’t fill — migrant worker jobs; low-wage jobs in restaurants; jobs in landscape. …

Once they’re here, they have been working. They have been providing for their families the best they can. They have been told at some point in time by politicians on both sides of the aisle that there will eventually be a process by which [they] will be able to achieve citizenship. They have had this hope. It’s never happened. (more…)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.