Thrash Blocks Aspects of Georgia Immigration Law

From The Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

By KATE BRUMBACK, The Associated Press–June 27, 2011 05:31 PM EDT

ATLANTA — A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked parts of Georgia’s strict new law targeting illegal immigration from taking effect, including a provision that authorizes police to check the immigration status of suspects without proper identification and to detain illegal immigrants.

Georgia’s became the latest in a string of state laws that have been at least temporarily stopped by legal challenges. All or parts of similar laws in Arizona, Utah and Indiana also have been blocked by federal judges.

Judge Thomas Thrash also granted a request from civil liberties groups to block a part of Georgia’s law that penalizes people who knowingly and willingly transport or harbor illegal immigrants while committing another crime.

“The defendants wildly exaggerate the scope of the federal crime of harboring under (the law) when they claim that the Plaintiffs are violating federal immigration law by giving rides to their friends and neighbors who are illegal aliens,” he said.

The judge was especially critical of that provision, blasting the state’s assertion that federal immigration enforcement is “passive.” Thrash noted that federal immigration officers remove more than 900 foreign citizens from the country on an average day. (more…)

Practicality Of Georgia Immigration Law In Question

From The Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

 

Jeremy Redmon–8:35 p.m. Monday, June 20, 2011

A federal judge on Monday asked tough questions about the potential fallout from Georgia’s new anti-illegal immigration law but said he would rule later on whether it should be halted.  

 
Walter Cumming, special U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Thrash focued on practical aspects of Georgia’s new anti-illegal immigrant law in a Monday hearing, suggesting it would not be enforced consistently across the state and that local authorities could choose who to target.

 
Many of the legal arguments for and against the Arizona-style law revolve around whether it is constitutional. But during a hearing Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Thrash repeatedly focused on the law’s practicality. He questioned its purpose, suggested it would not be enforced consistently across state’s 159 counties and said local authorities could pick and choose who to target with it, favoring some people and not others.

Thrash, who was nominated to the court by President Bill Clinton, offered one hypothetical example in which local authorities could target immigrants to get them out of their public schools but not touch the immigrant cook who works at the popular Mexican restaurant in town. The judge also questioned whether teenage U.S. citizens should be prosecuted for driving their illegal immigrant parents to the grocery store. (more…)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.