Ala. Immigration Law Targets Students

From The Center For American Progress:

By Natalia Mercado Violand |July 22, 2011

Just when it seemed Alabama had left its dark past of segregation behind, its legislature passed one of the nation’s strictest anti-immigration bills, H.B. 56, taking the state back in time 50 years.

During the civil rights struggles, Birmingham, Alabama, was the epicenter of the civil rights movement’s struggles for equality. It was known for having one of the most violent, aggressive, and pro-segregation police forces and one of most hostile education systems in the nation. Today, in a setting that is all too familiar, H.B. 56 reestablishes the educational racial barriers Alabama supposedly put in its past.

Gov. Robert Bentley (R) signed H.B. 56 into law on June 9, 2011, an anti-immigration bill even harsher than Arizona’s infamous S.B. 1070. Like S.B. 1070, the bill allows police to arrest anyone suspected of being an illegal immigrant even if they’re stopped for a minimal traffic violation. The bill makes it a criminal offense in Alabama to rent a house or apartment to undocumented immigrants or to knowingly give an undocumented immigrant a ride. It also makes E-Verify, a faulty and expensive Internet-based verification mechanism, mandatory for employers.

But worst of all is that the law turns educators into immigration officials. Going even beyond Arizona, the law targets students and requires that schools collect information about the legal status of students and their parents. This law will lead inevitably to widespread racial profiling in education as in law enforcement. (more…)

Pearce’s Recall Election Date Set

From the Associated Press:

By PAUL DAVENPORT   07/12/11 08:55 PM ET

PHOENIX — Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has announced a Nov. 8 recall election for the leader of the state Senate who was the chief sponsor of the state’s controversial legislation against illegal immigration.

Brewer’s action Tuesday was expected because elections officials certified last week that opponents of Senate President Russell Pearce had collected enough signatures to force the recall election.

Pearce is best known for sponsoring immigration measures, including the 2010 enforcement law known as SB1070. A judge has placed key provisions of that measure on hold while they’re challenged in federal court.

But the people calling for the Republican’s ouster have focused their criticism on other issues, such as cuts to education and social services.

He says he’ll remain in office and campaign for retention by voters in his legislative district.

Arizona S.B. 1070 Incites Other States

From The New York Times:

By

Published: May 27, 2011

The decision by the Supreme Court this week upholding an Arizona law punishing employers for hiring illegal immigrants was an energy boost for state lawmakers across the country who have proposed bills this year to curb illegal immigration. As if they needed it.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, state lawmakers set a new record in the first three months of the year, proposing 1,538 bills related to immigration, with 141 measures in 26 states passed into law. While some of those laws extended new opportunities to illegal immigrants, like permitting them to pay lower in-state tuition rates at public colleges, most of the laws imposed restrictions on them.

With its decision on the hiring law that Arizona passed in 2007, the Supreme Court indicated that it would not flat out disallow any action by states on immigration enforcement, even though federal law generally pre-empts state measures in that area. State lawmakers now know for certain that there is some firm legal ground for the recent round of bills that seek to drive illegal immigrants out of the country by preventing them from taking jobs and even living here.

But it remains unclear just how large the playing field is that the Supreme Court has opened. Arizona’s employer law was carefully tailored to conform to specific, narrow terms in federal immigration law, and it was never suspended by any federal court. To date, only a handful of states have passed laws with requirements and penalties for employers similar to Arizona’s.

(more…)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.