Supreme Court To Rule On States’ Anti-Immigrant Laws

From The Associated Press:

By MARK SHERMAN

Dec. 12, 2011

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court agreed Monday to rule on Arizona’s controversial law targeting illegal immigrants.

The justices said they will review a federal appeals court ruling that blocked several tough provisions in the Arizona law. One of those requires that police, while enforcing other laws, question a person’s immigration status if officers suspect he is in the country illegally.

The Obama administration challenged the Arizona law by arguing that regulating immigration is the job of the federal government, not states. Similar laws in Alabama, South Carolina and Utah also are facing administration lawsuits. Private groups are suing over immigration measures adopted in Georgia and Indiana.

The court now has three politically charged cases on its election-year calendar. The other two are President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul and new electoral maps for Texas’ legislature and congressional delegation.

Justice Elena Kagan will not take part in the Arizona case, presumably because of her work on the issue when she served in the Justice Department.

Arguments probably will take place in late April, which would give the court roughly two months to decide the case. (more…)

Justice Department Sues Utah Over Anti-Immigrant Law

From The Associated Press:

November 22, 2011

The U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit Tuesday challenging Utah’s immigration enforcement law, arguing that it usurps federal authority and could potentially lead to the harassment and detention of American citizens and authorized visitors.

“The federal government has the ultimate authority to enforce federal immigration laws and the Constitution does not permit a patchwork of local immigration policies,” Justice Department officials said in a statement. “A state setting its own immigration policy interferes with the federal government’s enforcement efforts.”

The lawsuit was filed Tuesday in Salt Lake City’s U.S. District Court after months of negotiations between Justice Department attorneys, Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff and the state’s elected leaders. Justice officials said they plan to continue those discussions despite the lawsuit.

Even with the federal intervention, state officials remained confident the law would eventually be sustained. (more…)

Ala. Immigration Law Could Push Feds In New Direction

From The Huntsville Times:

Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley sAlabama Gov. Robert Bentley is flanked by Sen. Scott Beason, R-Gardendale, left, and Micky Hammon, R-Decatur, right, as he speaks before signing Alabama’s law cracking down on illegal immigration in June. (AP Photo, Mickey Welsh)

By Brian Lawson, The Huntsville Times

Published: Monday, October 10, 2011, 7:18 AM

HUNTSVILLE, Alabama — Through the years, Alabama has been pushed by the federal government, through the courts, to make changes to its laws.

But in the debate over the state’s immigration law, it may be Alabama that pulls federal law in a new direction.

The federal courts are still looking at immigration laws in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana and Utah. And South Carolina’s immigration law is set to go into effect Jan. 1.

The patchwork approach that the Justice Department has argued against in court filings seems to be gaining speed.

And the decision by U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn last month to leave in place key provisions of Alabama’s law, where similar measures had been blocked by other federal courts, certainly raises the stakes.

In court filings last week, the Justice Department said there is no room under federal law for a state to enact a separate immigration law enforcement system. Judge Blackburn rejected that argument in late September.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta will take up requests this week to block Alabama law. (more…)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.